From Evolution.News
Evolution News July 27, 2021 Pat Flynn and Jim Madden press Behe with objections — some philosophic, others scientific — to see how well his position stands up to scrutiny. Evolution News May 3, 2021 Evolutionists argue that organisms can evolve by loss of function. Sounds like Behe’s hypothesis. But you’ll never get wings and eyes that way. Casey Luskin February 16, 2021 The literature is looking at the same data that intelligent design proponents are looking at, making similar observations, and asking similar questions. Casey Luskin January 19, 2021 Over the past few years, I’ve seen ID critics advance some wild and amusing conspiracy theories about the reasons for my departure and absence. David Klinghoffer December 26, 2020 Books by Behe, and other ID theorists doing an independent of audit of evolutionary thinking, find devastating faults in the theory. David Klinghoffer December 18, 2020 Once again, Darwinists seek to avoid an argument by using clever talk, giving the false impression of a scientist, Behe, who brushes away challenges. David Klinghoffer November 24, 2020 The idea of the book is not merely to dunk on the critics. Michael Behe, to be frank, doesn’t find of any their criticisms very meaningful. David Klinghoffer November 18, 2020 The public is being prepared very slowly for the demise of Darwinian evolutionary theory. It wasn’t planned this way, but it is how things are playing out. David Klinghoffer November 17, 2020 Biochemist Michael Behe has been conducting a decades-long independent scientific audit of the evidence for unguided Darwinian evolution. Evolution News October 23, 2020 How could blind evolution arrange biochemical parts into complex functional wholes one small step at a time, as Darwin and his followers envision?
